A practical methodology for valuing claims, risks, and settlement options
Determining whether to accept a settlement offer or continue litigation is one of the most challenging decisions lawyers face. Without a systematic methodology, assessing the value of a litigation position can be subjective, risky, and inconsistent.
This 1-hour practical webinar provides a structured approach to valuing litigation positions. Participants will learn a 3-step methodology that considers probability-weighted monetary claims, non-monetary advantages and disadvantages of litigation, and the risks associated with pursuing a claim. Using real-world case studies, the session equips practitioners with the tools to determine a party’s “bottom line,” make informed settlement decisions, and integrate valuation into litigation strategy.
By the end of this course, participants will be able to:
Barrister | 5 Wentworth
Hugh Stowe has been at the Bar since 2000. He has a wide ranging commercial and equity practice, appearing predominantly in the Supreme Court and Federal Court, doing trial and appellate work, both led and unled. Before coming to the bar, Mr Stowe practised as a solicitor at the firms now known as King & Wood Mallesons and Herbert Smith Freehills, and was associate to the Chief Justice of the Federal Court of Australia. Mr Stowe has a Masters of Law from Cambridge, and has lectured in law at the University of Durham, UK. Mr Stowe has published on expert evidence preparation and in various other fields. He is also a qualified mediator, and has strong interest and experience in settlement theory and practice.
